Client Intake to Proposal in 90 Minutes: A Mock Advisory Case Study

Mock case study: AI-assisted intake triage and proposal drafting for a Sydney advisory firm.

From email chaos to structured proposals.

This is a mock case study designed to show what a realistic AI implementation could look like for a professional services firm. Names and numbers are illustrative, but the workflow design reflects real delivery patterns.


Snapshot

Firm profile: Sydney-based advisory practice, 22 staff, 6 client-facing consultants
Core issue: slow intake, delayed scoping, inconsistent proposal quality
Project window: 8 weeks from discovery to live rollout
Primary objective: reduce time from inquiry to proposal while improving consistency


The Problem

The team was losing momentum in the first 48 hours of every new inquiry.

  • New leads arrived via website forms, email threads, and referral messages.
  • Discovery details were captured differently by each consultant.
  • Scope summaries were often incomplete, so proposal drafting restarted multiple times.
  • Senior team members spent high-value time rewriting first drafts.

The outcome was predictable: slow turnaround, inconsistent proposal quality, and avoidable internal friction.


What We Implemented

1. AI Intake Triage

An intake assistant normalized incoming inquiries into a structured brief:

  • client type and urgency
  • service category and likely scope band
  • key risk/compliance flags
  • missing information checklist

2. Scoping Prompt Framework

We created a guided scoping workflow so consultants could validate assumptions quickly instead of drafting from scratch.

3. Proposal Draft Generation

Using the approved scope brief, AI generated first-draft proposals with:

  • service summary
  • delivery phases and assumptions
  • timeline and milestones
  • fee structure template language

4. Human Review Layer

No proposal was sent without consultant review. AI accelerated drafting; humans controlled quality and commercial judgment.


Results (Mock Metrics)

  • Inquiry-to-first-draft time: 2.5 days to 90 minutes
  • Proposal revision cycles: 3.2 average to 1.4 average
  • Senior rework time: reduced by 46%
  • On-time proposal delivery: 61% to 93%

These are representative outcomes for a well-scoped first-phase implementation, not guaranteed benchmarks.


Why It Worked

  • The team standardized inputs before automating outputs.
  • AI handled repeatable structure; consultants handled strategy and nuance.
  • Review checkpoints prevented low-quality or off-brand proposals.
  • The rollout focused on one revenue-critical workflow first.

Implementation Notes

If this were a live engagement, phase one would typically include:

  • discovery workshop and process mapping
  • policy and data-handling guardrails
  • pilot workflow with 1-2 service lines
  • success metrics baseline and post-launch tracking

Next Step

If you'd like, we can run this exact workflow against your process and show where AI can cut turnaround time without reducing quality.

Want this workflow mapped to your firm?

Book a free consultation and we'll identify where intake, scoping, and proposal drafting can be accelerated safely.

Book your free consultation →